Media Literacy: The Purposes and Rationale
For the Media Literacy movement to grow in the United States, its advocates will need to carefully, consistently and cautiously articulate the purposes it serves.
The visibility of the movement, while important, is less significant than its viability, which ultimately relies upon its credibility.
Given the decline in both juvenile crime and teen intercourse -- both occurring amidst increasing media depictions of sexuality and violence, one must be very cautious about putting all of media literacy's pedagogical eggs in a so-called "protectionist" basket. If the media contributes to or causes such behavior, why ask critics, is the behavior going down, not up.
As a relatively new movement in American education, media literacy appeals to many constituencies. It is embraced by health educators, faith-based organizations, various consumer advocacy groups, citizenship and community organizations, among others.
But it is the public schools of the nation that will be the front line in the battle for media literacy. One recurring pattern in the nations that have long ago included media literacy in the school curriculum, has been the active, grassroots movement of classroom teachers.
Many teachers in this country find themselves caught in an ongoing conflict and competition between the demands of a crowded curriculum, parents concerns and the relentless high-stakes testing that characterizes the current climate of accountability.
In short they already have so many demands placed upon them, that any meaningful attempt to encourage them to embrace media literacy, must start with their concerns, their discipline, their state standards and the traditional goals and mission statements of American education.
This management strategy, places media literacy within American education as the natural evolution of literacy and therefore a co-partner with computer literacy and information literacy.
It is certainly true, that the spirit of media literacy is already, abundantly evident in the frameworks and standard of many states.
In California for example the ELA [English Language Arts Standards] state that students should be able to "identify, analyze and critique persuasive techniques in media messages".The Social Studies curriculum in the same state, says students should be able to "Evaluate, take and defend, positions on the influence of media on American political life".
In Texas, the Essential Knowledge and Skills for English, Language Arts and Reading has an extensive section on media representations. Students are for example, expected to, "recognize genres such as nightly news, news magazines and documentaries and identify the unique properties of each".
Generally regarded as bellwether states, Texas and California frequently set patterns and trends followed by other school systems, where they have for example, a huge influence on the content of textbooks.
The Perspective at Appalachian State's
Graduate Program in Media Literacy
An understanding of the way media education has evolved in other nations is deeply imbedded in Appalachian's interdisciplinary approach which locates media literacy in numerous departments and fields, including Curriculum and Instruction, Library Science, Social Studies, Health Education and Language, Reading and Exceptionalities.Three broad phases of the British approach, Protection, Discrimination and Empowerment, have been connected to the traditional and emerging goals of American education and re-formulated as Protection, Preparation and Pleasure. While it is of course simplistic to assume that the complexities of media literacy can be adequately summarized in 3 words, the spirit and meaning of the words can be consistently found in the language of leading scholars. David Buckingham's work for example, builds some very strong bridges to the concepts of Preparation and Pleasure . More attention he says , needs to be focused on "how the media might more effectively prepare children for the responsibilities of adult citizenship".
For those who wish to protect children, by immunizing them against tobacco or alcohol advertising, Buckingham warns that we are venturing into an arena where young people, express "a considerable amount of pleasure". Too much emphasis upon the cognitive processing of advertising he says, fails to take into account "the expressive, emotional or symbolic" aspects of the encounter between the media and young consumers. Teaching young people to recognize that advertising is a form of manipulation, demystifying the media by revealing the tools and techniques it uses, does not, he tells us, preclude the pleasure and enjoyment they receive from advertising.
While much of the undoubtedly well-meaning protectionist agenda concentrates on monitoring media content, considerably less attention is focused on the complex way in which audiences or consumers make sense of that content. Ironically, when we delete the word media, and turn our attention instead to the subject of literacy, we find that the literature of that field consistently suggests the process of "meaning-making" as Bruner calls it, is much more complex.
A recent issue of Reading Research Quarterly for example, offered the following comment in a study of how adolescent males interpret what they read. "Readers responses to texts are informed by their past experiences as people of particular races, ethnicities, social classes and genders". The Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy also contains ample evidence of the way in which traditional literacy has moved well beyond the matter of readers who can comprehend or appreciate the meaning of a text. Here we read of literacy as a means of "challenging and transforming dominant discourses and ideologies". Reading now, encompasses the process of resistance.
Taken from Visual Messages (2nd. edition, 1999) David Considine and Gail Haley, Libraries Unlimited.
Purpose 1: Preparation
Media Literacy: An Introduction to Media Literacy by Dr. David Considine
Media Literacy: First National Media Literacy Conference at ASU
Media Literacy: Summit 2000: Reflections on Toronto Conference